Sellrics

Marketing

True ad profitability — past platform-reported ROAS

Meta and Google each claim the same conversion. Sellrics ties spend to the SKUs that actually converted and reads it against fee-aware contribution margin, not gross revenue.

The problem

Every ad platform reports a flattering ROAS by claiming credit for orders it did not drive. Add them up and your "blended ROAS" says you are profitable while the bank balance says otherwise.

How Sellrics does it

Sellrics pulls spend and performance from Meta Ads, Google Ads, and GA4, attributes it to converting SKUs, and reports ROAS, CAC, and MER per campaign plus a creative, keyword, and search-term breakdown and a per-channel health audit (backend/api/ads.py — get_ads, get_campaign_detail, get_ads_creatives, get_ads_keywords, get_ads_channel_audit). MER (total revenue ÷ total ad spend) gives a blended view that does not depend on any one platform’s attribution.

What the numbers mean

ROAS is attributed revenue ÷ spend for a campaign. CAC is spend ÷ new customers acquired. MER is total revenue ÷ total ad spend across all channels. Read all three against contribution margin: a 3x ROAS on a 25%-margin product is roughly breakeven after fees.

A worked example

Illustrative example
Scenario
Meta reports 4.2x ROAS, Google reports 3.8x, on a product line at 22% fee-aware margin.
What Sellrics surfaces
Blended MER across both platforms is 2.1x — well below the ~4.5x this margin needs to profit. The platform numbers double-counted; the SKU-level attribution shows which campaigns actually drove full-price orders.
The move
Cut the campaigns below the margin-adjusted MER threshold, keep the ones tied to real full-price SKU conversions, and set new-customer spend to the CAC-payback point.

Today — tabs and a spreadsheet

Meta Ads Manager
ROAS 4.2x · spend $3,200
Shopify → Orders export
CSV, 1,240 rows, no fees column
Spreadsheet, cell F12
=B12-C12-D12-E12 ← by hand, weekly

Manual, a week behind, and it still doesn't net Amazon referral or FBA fees against the campaign that drove the order.

Ad efficiency — reported vs blended

Meta — reported ROAS4.2x
Google — reported ROAS3.8x
Blended MER (all channels)2.1x
Needed to profit at 22% margin≈ 4.5x

Blended MER measured against fee-aware margin is the number that says whether the spend profits — here it doesn't.

Blended MER — trailing 8 weeks

Illustrative

Blended MER has held around 2.1x for two months — the gap to the 4.5x line is spend that isn't paying for itself, regardless of what Meta and Google each report.

Illustrative — platform-reported ROAS vs blended MER vs what you keep after fees.

Ad profitability — frequently asked

See it on your own numbers.

Start free — no credit card required

Prefer to talk first? Talk to us →